The Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act (The CARES Act) includes several temporary tax law changes to help charities. This includes the special $300 deduction designed especially for people who choose to take the standard deduction, rather than itemizing their deductions.
This change allows individual taxpayers to claim a deduction of up to $300 for cash donations made to charity during 2020. This deduction lowers both adjusted gross income and taxable income – translating into tax savings for those making donations to qualifying tax-exempt organizations.
Before making a donation, taxpayers should check the Tax Exempt Organization Search tool on IRS.gov to make sure the organization is eligible for tax deductible donations.
Cash donations include those made by check, credit card or debit card. They don’t include securities, household items or other property. Though cash contributions to most charitable organizations qualify, some don’t. People should review Publication 526, Charitable Contributions for details. Cash contributions made to supporting organizations are not tax deductible.
IRS Tax Tip 2017-53, October 3, 2017
Taxpayers who get an unexpected or unsolicited phone call from the IRS should be wary – it’s probably a scam. Phone calls continue to be one of the most common ways that thieves try to get taxpayers to provide personal information. These scammers then use that information to gain access to the victim’s bank or other account.
When a taxpayer answers the phone, it might be a recording or an actual person claiming to be from the IRS. Sometimes the scammer tells the taxpayer they owe money and must pay right away. They might also say the person has a refund waiting, and then they ask for bank account information over the phone.
Taxpayers should not take the bait and fall for this trick. Here are several tips that will help taxpayers avoid becoming a scam victim.
The real IRS will not:
- Call to demand immediate payment
- Call someone if they owe taxes without first sending a bill in the mail
- Demand tax payment and not allow the taxpayer to question or appeal the amount owed
- Require that someone pay their taxes a certain way, such as with a prepaid debit card
- Ask for credit or debit card numbers over the phone
- Threaten to bring in local police or other agencies to arrest a taxpayer who doesn’t pay
- Threaten a lawsuit
Taxpayers who don’t owe taxes or who have no reason to think they do should follow these steps:
Taxpayers who think they might actually owe taxes should follow these steps:
- Ask for a call back number and an employee badge number.
- Call the IRS at 1-800-829-1040.
Every taxpayer has a set of fundamental rights they should be aware of when dealing with the IRS. These are the Taxpayer Bill of Rights. Taxpayers can visit IRS.gov to explore their rights and the agency’s obligations to protect them.
As most taxpayers know, the IRS generally does not have unlimited time to assess income tax against them. In most cases, section 6501(a) establishes a three-year limitations period for assessment. However, there are several exceptions to this general rule. Section 6501(c)(1), for example, provides an exception for ‘‘false or fraudulent return[s] with the intent to evade tax.’’ For those returns, the assessment period remains open indefinitely and the IRS can assess tax at any time.
…the IRS has recently taken the position that the intent can be either that of the taxpayer or the preparer.
Court decisions have created a divide on whether the requisite intent to evade tax under section 6501(c)(1) is that of the taxpayer, the preparer, or, oddly enough, the return itself.1 Although the statute is silent about whose intent controls, the IRS has recently taken the position that the intent can be either that of the taxpayer or the preparer.2 Not surprisingly, taxpayers with no knowledge that their preparers made fraudulent returns with the intent to evade tax have argued that they should not be subject to open-ended assessments for wrongful acts committed by the preparers.3
This report details the history of the unlimited assessment period for false or fraudulent returns and examines the code’s definition of fraud since 1918. It analyzes recent and not-so-recent IRS chief counsel advice and court decisions on the issue of whose fraud is relevant for the application of section 6501(c)(1). It also looks at the fairness and due process concerns that arise when taxpayers are penalized for acts committed by their return preparers.4 Finally, it concludes that taxpayers should not bear responsibility for fraudulent acts of their preparers absent evidence of actual involvement or knowledge on the part of the taxpayer.5
Kelly A. McGinnity is a partner at Schlack & McGinnity PC. This report was adapted from a research paper prepared for the tax LLM seminar at Loyola University Chicago School of Law.